{"id":118,"date":"2009-01-26T00:36:39","date_gmt":"2009-01-26T05:36:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/elegans.uky.edu\/blog\/?p=118"},"modified":"2009-01-26T00:36:39","modified_gmt":"2009-01-26T05:36:39","slug":"httpscienceblogscomprinciples20090113_things_that_dont_make_sensephp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/?p=118","title":{"rendered":"Discussion of 13 Things That Don&#8217;t Make Sense, by Michael Brooks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I read a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/13_things_that_dont_make_sense.php\">review<\/a> of Michael Brooks&#8217;s <em>13 Things That Don&#8217;t Make Sense <\/em>on the Uncertain Principles blog.  I haven&#8217;t read the book, but the review tickled me enough that I looked around for more info and found Jennifer Ouellette&#8217;s review in The New Scientist where Brooks is a contributor.<\/p>\n<p>Both Chad Orzel and Jennifer Ouellette give Brooks weak &#8220;this book has some weak parts but also some good parts&#8221; reviews.  Just from the reviews and blurbs I can tell Brooks book is destructive, part worthless speculation on the meaning of anomalous results that are almost certainly erroneous and part flattering discussion of pseudoscience.<\/p>\n<p>Why are people giving Brooks such gentle reviews?  The physics results are typical of the lot.  John Webb&#8217;s fine-structure result is of the same sort as the Viking experiment result.  Interesting if true, but not reproduced and instead contradicted by other experiments and thus uninteresting.<\/p>\n<p>Brooks doesn&#8217;t understand that for something to not &#8216;Make Sense&#8217; it has to be true.  Anomalous *verified* results, results that can&#8217;t be explained theoretically or seem to contradict existing results are the kinds of things that &#8216;Don&#8217;t Make Sense&#8217; but could be cool.  These are the kinds of things that Brooks should be writing about.<\/p>\n<p>One of Brooks&#8217;s topics is the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mimivirus\">mimivirus<\/a>, a virus with the largest genome known so far (1.2 Mb).   I can&#8217;t imagine anything particularly Earth shaking about it&#8211;it&#8217;s really big for a virus, but that&#8217;s it.  Biology is littered with oddities and weird exceptions.  No one tell Brooks about <i>ttn-1<\/i>, a titin protein 57X larger than the average worm protein.  Or about the ostrich.<\/p>\n<p>The placebo effect has two components, self-delusion and a poorly understood mechanism whereby the state of mind can affect the body.  The mind->body connection is true and poorly understood, the proper subject of Brook&#8217;s book.<\/p>\n<p>In Jennifer Ouellette&#8217;s review she says that Brooks includes homeopathy because of its relation to the placebo effect.  This is ridiculous&#8211;any of the thousands of worthless &#8216;medical&#8217; treatments known from blood letting to magic spells have this property.<\/p>\n<p>Brooks&#8217;s inclusion of homeopathy and death is complete nonsense.  Homeopathy is pseudoscience, bunkum.  And there well understood evolutionary reasons why organisms die, death (and aging) are not even anomalous.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I read a review of Michael Brooks&#8217;s 13 Things That Don&#8217;t Make Sense on the Uncertain Principles blog. I haven&#8217;t read the book, but the review tickled me enough that I looked around for more info and found Jennifer Ouellette&#8217;s review in The New Scientist where Brooks is a contributor. Both Chad Orzel and Jennifer [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-pseudoscience"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=118"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimlund.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}